I did not understand the proof to Theorem 10.17. With the introduction of new sets and other information, I lost track of what was going on. The theorem makes sense but the proof is still a little fuzzy.
I like the idea of mapping the elements of one set to a subset of that same set. It starts to make comparing cardinalities more exciting. I am looking forward to seeing what ideas we can take from this idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment